Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Virology Journal and BioMed Central.

Open Access Short report

Isolation and molecular characterization of type I and type II feline coronavirus in Malaysia

Alazawy Amer12, Arshad Siti Suri1*, Omar Abdul Rahman1, Hair Bejo Mohd1, Bande Faruku1, Sharif Saeed1 and Tengku Ibrahim Tengku Azmi3

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor 43400, Malaysia

2 Iraq, Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Diyala, Diyala, Iraq

3 Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia

For all author emails, please log on.

Virology Journal 2012, 9:278  doi:10.1186/1743-422X-9-278


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.virologyj.com/content/9/1/278


Received:5 April 2012
Accepted:15 November 2012
Published:21 November 2012

© 2012 Amer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) are two important coronaviruses of domestic cat worldwide. Although FCoV is prevalent among cats; the fastidious nature of type I FCoV to grow on cell culture has limited further studies on tissue tropism and pathogenesis of FCoV. While several studies reported serological evidence for FCoV in Malaysia, neither the circulating FCoV isolated nor its biotypes determined. This study for the first time, describes the isolation and biotypes determination of type I and type II FCoV from naturally infected cats in Malaysia.

Findings

Of the total number of cats sampled, 95% (40/42) were RT-PCR positive for FCoV. Inoculation of clinical samples into Crandell feline kidney cells (CrFK), and Feline catus whole fetus-4 cells (Fcwf-4), show cytopathic effect (CPE) characterized by syncytial cells formation and later cell detachment. Differentiation of FCoV biotypes using RT-PCR assay revealed that, 97.5% and 2.5% of local isolates were type I and type II FCoV, respectively. These isolates had high sequence homology and phylogenetic similarity with several FCoV isolates from Europe, South East Asia and USA.

Conclusions

This study reported the successful isolation of local type I and type II FCoV evident with formation of cytopathic effects in two types of cell cultures namely the CrFK and Fcwf-4 , where the later cells being more permissive. However, the RT-PCR assay is more sensitive in detecting the antigen in suspected samples as compared to virus isolation in cell culture. The present study indicated that type I FCoV is more prevalent among cats in Malaysia.

Keywords:
FCoV; FIPV; CrFK; Fcwf-4; S-gene; Phylogenetics; Cats; Malaysia

Findings

Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is an enveloped RNA virus belonging to Coronaviridae. The disease is prevalent especially in catteries and multiple-cat household [1]. FCoV consist of two biotypes; Feline infectious peritonitis (FIPV) which is highly fatal and caused immune mediated complex, and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) which caused from asymptomatic infection to severe enteritis [1,2].

Two types of FCoV could be distinguished based on serology and sequence analysis. Type I FCoV is wholly feline-associated and prevalent in natural cases of coronavirus infections but it poorly proliferates in cell culture. On the other hand, type II FCoV is less common but grows in different cell lines such as Fcwf-4 and CrFK cells [3,4].

Although evidence of FIP have been reported among cat population in Malaysia [5,6], the circulating FCoV virus neither isolated nor characterized. Thus, the objectives of this study are to isolate and determine the FCoV biotypes occurring in Malaysia.

Of the 42 RNA samples used in this study, 40 samples (95%) were positive and 2 samples (5%) were negative for FCoV following RT-PCR assay. Of these, RT-PCR positive samples, 95% (40/42) and 73.8% (31/42) were able to adapt and multiply in Fcwf-4 and CrFK cell cultures, respectively. Two samples which were positive with RT-PCR assay were found not to grow in cell culture. The entire 40 tissue culture adapted virus were used in the subsequent studies.

Upon virus inoculation, infected CrFK cells showed initial CPE at passage two with moderate to diffuse CPE at 4–5 days post inoculation (PI). The appearance of CPE became rapid during second and third passages. As the virus propagation reaches the fifth passages; the onset of CPE appeared within 24–48 hours PI. Complete CPE (> 80%) was noticed 48–72 hours PI (Figure 1). On the other hand, infected Fcwf-4 cells showed initial CPE following first passage, with some samples at second passages. The initial CPE was recorded at 2–3 days PI. As the virus passages reach the third passages, the onset of CPE appeared within 24 hours PI and completed within 36–48 hours PI (Figure 2).

thumbnailFigure 1. CrFK-4 cell cultures showing cytopathic changes following infection with reference and local FCoV isolate UPM 11C/08. Morphology of cells infected with local FCoV UPM 11C/08 isolate at passage 3 (A). where the initial CPE was observed at passage 2. At fifth viral passages, complete CPE occurred within 48-72hours PI. Morphology of cells infected with reference FIPV-79-1146 strain (B). Infected cells show CPE characterized by cells rounding, clumped and detachment (arrows). Note that the changes in cells infected with UPM11C/08 are comparable to reference strain. Control uninfected cells remained normal (C). Unstained.

thumbnailFigure 2. Fcwf-4 cell cultures showing cytopathic changes following infection with reference and local FCoV isolate UPM 11C/08. Morphology of cells infected with local FCoV UPM 11C/08 isolate at passage 3 (A). where the initial CPE was observed at passage 1. At third viral passages, complete CPE occurred within 24 hours PI. Morphology of cells infected with reference FIPV-79-1146 strain. (B). The infected cells show CPE characterized by cells rounding, clumped and detachment (arrows). Note that the changes in cells infected with UPM11C/08 are comparable to reference strain. Control uninfected cells remained normal (C). Unstained.

Both infected CrFK and Fcwf-4 cells showed similar morphological changes characterized by increased opacity and refractile of the infected cells. Infected cells become rounded, granular and clumped forming syncytial cells which increased in size and number as the incubation period extended. Syncytial cells were observed to contain between 20–30 nuclei per cell at 36–48 hours PI, although 8–10 nuclei per cell was most common (Figure 3). Morphological changes observed in CrFK and Fcwf-4 following infection with FCoV isolates were comparable to reference FIPV-79-1146. Both control uninfected cells remained normal.

thumbnailFigure 3. Syncytial cells formation following infection of Fcwf-4 cell culture with FCoV UPM 11C/08 isolate. Infected cells show loss of plasma membrane and nuclear aggregation, resulting in formation of syncytial cells containing more than 20 nuclei (arrows), 36 hours PI. 20x Mag. Scale bar, 100 μ m. Normal uninfected Fcwf-4 cell culture at 72 hours. H&E staining (A). Cells appeared as spindle to stellate morphology and regularly arranged. 10x Mag. Scale bar, 200 μm (B).

Indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IIF) on infected cells showed viral antigens were present in the cytoplasm, where the earliest signals appeared as fine to coarse immunofluorescent granules in the perinuclear region of the infected cells at 6 hours PI (Figure 4).

thumbnailFigure 4. Immunofluorescent antibodies staining of infected CrFK cells following infection with local FCoV UPM11C/08 isolate. The fluorescence signal appeared as granules covering areas within the cytoplasm at 24 hours PI (arrow). No signal is present in the nucleus. 100x Mag. Scale bar, 20μm (A). Absence of fluorescence signal in control uninfected cell cultures. 10x Mag. Bar = 200μm (B).

Differentiation of FCoV using specific primer sets for type I (fecv1b) and type II FCoV (fecv2b) yielded an expected amplification product of 275 bp and 232 bp denoting to type I FCoV (n = 39/40) and type II FCoV (n= 1/40), respectively ( data not shown). A total of 13 selected RT-PCR products samples, each from type I (n1=12) and type II (n2=1) local FCoV were sequenced for compared with reference strains and subjected for phylogenetic analysis.

The findings from phylogenetic analysis of local FCoV further support their biotyping where majority of local FCoVs (n=12) closely branched together with type I reference FCoV and only one sample; UPM8Ca/08 was found to cluster with type II FCoV (Figure 5). The nucleotide sequences and accession numbers of isolates derived from this study have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database (Table 1).

thumbnailFigure 5. Phylogenetic tree depicting relationships between Malaysian FCoV and reference FCoV isolates based on partial S gene sequence. The tree was generated using MEGA5 program. The tree reliability was calculated using 1000 bootstrapped replicates. Malaysian FCoVs are indicated in red italic.

Table 1. List of sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis of Malaysian FCOVs isolates

Comparison amongst local FCoV type I sequences revealed high degree of sequence homology, ranging from 93.2-99.5%. However, this similarity decreases to 90% when compared with the reference isolates. In contrast, type II FCoV isolates (UPM8Ca/08) only shows sequence identity ranging from 77.6-79% when compared with reference isolates. Malaysian FCoV type I isolates were phylogenetically closer to FCoV isolates from America, South East Asia, and Europe while UPM8Ca/08 which is the only identified type II isolates, was closer to FIPV 79–1146 and FIPV DF2 reference isolates originating from USA (Figure 5).

In this study, both RT-PCR and virus isolation were employed to detect the presence of FCoV from naturally infected domestic cats. The FCoV detection rate (95%) observed in this study is comparably higher than reported by Herrewegh et al. [7].

Based on partial S-gene sequence, the circulating virus in Malaysia was found to be predominately of type I FCoV (39/40). High incidence of type I FCoV (97.5%) in comparison to type II FCoV (2.5%) is in agreement with other findings reported in countries like Japan, Australia and Korea [8-10]. Similarly, the sequence homology observed among local FCoV isolates were in agreement with Lin et al.[11].

Comparing for virus adaptation in two cell lines revealed that Fcwf-4 was more permissive to local FCoV replication. Thus, all local FCoV type I isolates (39/39) were able to adapt and grow in Fcwf-4 cells as compared to only 77% (30/39) samples that grow on CrFK cells (data not shown). This finding further support the predilection of type I FCoV towards macrophages [4,12]. Replication of the virus is restricted in the cytoplasm of the infected cells as indicated by the presence of the fluorescent signals with the production of virus particle typical of coronavirus (13).

In conclusion, this study described the isolation of FCoV in feline cell culture from domestic cats in Malaysia. The isolates replicate in CrFK and Fcwf-4 cell cultures with the formation of CPE comparable to reference strain. Phylogenetic analyses show that majority of the local FCoV isolates belongs to type I and rarely of type II biotypes. Additionally, the study revealed that, Malaysia FCoV s is phylogenetically related with isolates from South East Asia, USA and UK, signifying possible common ancestral origin.

Material and methods

Ascitic fluid sample (n= 27) and postmortem tissues (n=15) were collected from 42 clinically ill client-owned presented at University Veterinary Hospital, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UVH -UPM) during 4-year period (2007–2010). The sampled cats comprises of 28 male and 14 females with age range from 6 month to 5 years. All cats came from neibouring areas within Klang valley and had no previous history of vaccination against FCoV as FIP vaccination is not a common practice in most clinics. Samples were consecutively designated as FCoV UPM1C/07 to UPM42C/10. The samples were processed and inoculated onto the CrFK (ATCC®; CCL-94) and Fcwf-4 (ATCC; CRL-2787) as described previously [13]. Uninfected CrFK and Fcwf-4 cells were used as negative control. The study was approved by Institution’s Animal Care and Use Committee, UPM (AUP No. 08R47).

Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of cell cultures was carried as described by Hsiung [14]. On the other hand, indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) test using polyclonal antibodies against FIPV 79–1146 virus was performed according to the method of Evermann et al. [15].

Viral RNA was extracted from infected cell cultures or Ascites fluid using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was performed using Access RT-PCR system (Promega, USA) [6] with previously described primers p205 and p211 [16]. Positive samples were further differentiated into type I and type II FCoV using biotypes specific oligonucleotide primers targeting S-gene region [17]. All primers were synthesized by First Base Laboratories Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia.

To gain insight on the genetic relatedness of Malaysian FCoV isolates, the partial S-gene sequences of randomly selected RT-PCR positive samples (n=13) were sequenced using the ABI BigDye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Bioscience). Nucleotide sequences were compared with the corresponding reference FCoV isolates using BLAST software available in NCBI database. Phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA5 software using Neighbor Joining tree method. The reliability of the phylogenetic trees was calculated using 1000 bootstrap [18] (Figure 5).

Abbreviations

FCoV: Feline coronavirus virus; RT-PCR: Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; RNA: Ribonucleic acid; LTR: Long terminal repeat; NCBI: National Centre for Biotechnology Information; UPM: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

AA: carried out the study and prepared the manuscript; SSA: Conceived the study, edited the manuscript and approved final copy for submission; OAR and MHB, participated in the study design and proof-read the manuscript; FB: carried out phylogenetic analysis, participated in manuscript drafting, proof-reading and submissions. SS: Optimized RT-PCR method for FCoV screening. All authors have read and approved final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their appreciations to the UVH-UPM for providing the samples and to Dr. Viviane Benetka, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria, for kindly providing the reference FCoV RNA samples. This work was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) Malaysia, project number 02-01-04-SF0485: Development of rapid test for diagnosis of feline coronavirus.

References

  1. Addie DD, Jarrett JO: A study of naturally occurring feline coronavirus infection in kittens.

    Vet Rec 1992, 130:133-137. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Boyle JF, Pedersen NC, Evermann JF, McKeirnan AJ, Ott RL, Black JW: Plaque assay, polypeptide composition and immunochemistry of feline infectious peritonitis virus and feline enteric coronavirus isolates.

    Adv Exp Med Biol 1984, 173:133-147. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Motokawa K, Hohdatsu T, Aizawa C, Koyama H, Hashimoto H: Molecular cloning and sequence determination of the peplomer protein gene of feline infectious peritonitis virus type I.

    Arch Virol 1995, 140:469-480. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Pedersen NC: A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection: 1963–2008.

    J Feline Med Surg 2009, 11:225-258. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Arshad SS, Lee WW, Hassan L, Kamarudin AIM, Siti-Farawahida AW, Cheng NABY: Serological survey of catteries for cats infected with feline coronavirus.

    J Vet Malaysia 2004, 17:19-22. OpenURL

  6. Sharif S, Arshad SS, Hair-Bejo M, Omar AR, Zeenathul NA, Fong LS: Descriptive distribution and phylogenetic analysis of feline infectious peritonitis virus isolates of Malaysia.

    Acta Vet Scandinavica 2010, 52:1-7. BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Herrewegh AAPM, Smeenk I, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJM, de Groot RJ: Feline coronavirus type II strains 79–1683 and 79–1146 originate from a double recombination between feline coronavirus type I and canine coronavirus.

    J Virol 1998, 72:4508-4520. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  8. Hohdatsu T, Okada S, Ishizuka Y, Yamada H, Koyama H: The prevalence of types I and II feline coronavirus infections in cats.

    J Vet Med Sci 1992, 54:557-562. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Benetka V, Kubber-Heiss A, Kolodziejek J, Nowotny N, Hofmann-Parisot M, Mostl K: Prevalence of feline coronavirus types I and II in cats with histopathologically verified feline infectious peritonitis.

    Vet Microbio 2004, 99:31-42. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. An DJ, Jeoung HY, Jeong W, Park JY, Lee MH, Park BK: Prevalence of Korean cats with natural feline coronavirus infections.

    Virol J 2011, 8:455. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Lin CN, Su BL, Wang CH, Hsieh MW, Chueh TJ, Chueh LL: Genetic diversity and correlation with feline infectious peritonitis of feline coronavirus type I and II: a 5-year study in Taiwan.

    Vet Microbiol 2009, 136:233-239. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Pedersen NC: An overview of feline enteric coronavirus and infectious peritonitis virus infections.

    Feline Pract 1995, 23:7-20. OpenURL

  13. Alazawy A, Arshad SS, Bejo MH, Omar AR, Tengku Ibrahim TA, Sharif S, Bande F, Awang-Isa K: Ultrastructure of Felis catus whole fetus (Fcwf-4) cell culture following infection with feline coronavirus.

    J Electron Microsc 2011, 60:275-282. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Hsiung GD: Diagnostic virology- an illustrated handbook. New Haven and London: Yale University Press; 1973. OpenURL

  15. Evermann JF, Heeney JL, McKeirnan AJ, O'Brien SJ: Comparative features of a coronavirus isolated from a cheetah with feline infectious peritonitis.

    Virus Res 1989, 13:15-27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Herrewegh AAPM, De Groot R, Cepica A, Egberink HF, Horzinek MC, Rottier P: Detection of feline coronavirus RNA in feces, tissues, and body fluids of naturally infected cats by reverse transcriptase PCR.

    J Clin Microbio 1995, 33:684-695. OpenURL

  17. Posch A, Posch U, Kubber-Heiss A, Seiser M, Moestl K: Differentiation of feline coronaviruses type I and II strains by RT-PCR. In Proceedings of the WSAVA World veterinary congress. Lyon; 1999. OpenURL

  18. Felsenstein J: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.

    Evolution 1985, 39:783-791. Publisher Full Text OpenURL