Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Prevalence for each FMDV infection positive found farm per month in relation to the farm population |
|||||||
|
Month [total number of farms sampled] |
Farm ID. |
total farm Population |
sampled |
infected |
Prevalence |
l. CI |
u. CI |
|
|
|||||||
|
April 2006 [18] |
3 |
1500 |
13 |
1 |
8% |
0% |
22% |
|
7 |
- |
9 |
6 |
67% |
36% |
97% |
|
|
8 |
250 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
11 |
360 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
15 |
200 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
May 2006 [7] |
3 |
193 |
6 |
6 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
|
|||||||
|
August 2006 [9] |
1 |
197 |
3 |
3 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
2 |
131 |
3 |
1 |
33% |
0% |
87% |
|
|
3 |
46 |
3 |
3 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
|
4 |
140 |
3 |
2 |
67% |
13% |
100% |
|
|
5 |
143 |
3 |
2 |
67% |
13% |
100% |
|
|
6 |
370 |
3 |
1 |
33% |
0% |
87% |
|
|
7 |
58 |
3 |
1 |
33% |
0% |
87% |
|
|
8 |
55 |
3 |
1 |
33% |
0% |
87% |
|
|
9 |
63 |
3 |
3 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
September 2006 [19] |
5 |
145 |
6 |
4 |
67% |
29% |
104% |
|
6 |
145 |
12 |
1 |
8% |
0% |
24% |
|
|
7 |
110 |
9 |
2 |
22% |
0% |
49% |
|
|
10 |
190 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
12 |
70 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
October 2006 [5] |
3 |
150 |
5 |
1 |
20% |
0% |
55% |
|
|
|||||||
|
November 2006 [5] |
5 |
260 |
6 |
1 |
17% |
0% |
46% |
|
|
|||||||
|
December 2006 [5] |
2 |
- |
5 |
1 |
20% |
0% |
55% |
|
3 |
700 |
6 |
6 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
|
4 |
90 |
6 |
4 |
67% |
29% |
100% |
|
|
5 |
196 |
5 |
3 |
60% |
17% |
100% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
January 2007 [17] |
2 |
120 |
10 |
2 |
20% |
0% |
45% |
|
7 |
107 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
8 |
143 |
20 |
8 |
40% |
19% |
61% |
|
|
9 |
272 |
10 |
1 |
10% |
0% |
29% |
|
|
11 |
111 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
13 |
214 |
10 |
1 |
10% |
0% |
29% |
|
|
17 |
505 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
February 2007 [5] |
1 |
266 |
6 |
1 |
17% |
0% |
46% |
|
2 |
162 |
6 |
5 |
83% |
54% |
100% |
|
|
3 |
124 |
6 |
4 |
67% |
29% |
100% |
|
|
4 |
372 |
6 |
2 |
33% |
0% |
71% |
|
|
5 |
266 |
6 |
5 |
83% |
54% |
100% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
March 2007 [5] |
1 |
150 |
6 |
5 |
83% |
54% |
100% |
|
2 |
175 |
6 |
3 |
50% |
10% |
90% |
|
|
3 |
65 |
6 |
2 |
33% |
0% |
71% |
|
|
4 |
80 |
6 |
2 |
33% |
0% |
71% |
|
|
5 |
122 |
6 |
3 |
50% |
10% |
90% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
April 2007 [17] |
1 |
205 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
12 |
145 |
9 |
2 |
22% |
0% |
49% |
|
|
15 |
122 |
9 |
1 |
11% |
0% |
32% |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Confidence intervals were calculated for a normal distributed population without finite population correction factor. This means that some confidence intervals related to very small sample size or extreme point estimates are doubtful (shown in grey). |
|||||||
|
Klein et al. Virology Journal 2008 5:53 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-5-53 |
|||||||
