Table 2

Pairwise comparisons of M1 genome segment and μ2 protein sequences from different reovirus isolates


Identity (%) compared with reovirus isolatea


Virus isolate
T1Lb
T1Lc
T2J
T3Dd
T3De
T1C11
T1C29
T1N84
T2N84
T2S59
T3C12
T3C18
T3C44
T3N83

T1Lb
--
99.9f
80.8
98.6
98.8
99.2
98.0
98.4
98.8
96.3
98.8
99.0
98.0
98.2
T1Lc
99.9f
--
81.0
98.8
98.9
99.3
98.1
98.5
98.9
96.2
98.9
99.2
98.1
98.4
T2J
71.6
71.6
--
80.0
80.2
80.4
80.3
80.2
80.4
81.5
80.2
80.3
80.3
80.4
T3Dd
97.8
97.9
70.9
--
99.6
98.6
97.4
97.8
98.2
95.5
99.6
98.5
97.4
98.0
T3De
97.9
98.0
71.0
99.7
--
98.8
97.6
98.0
98.4
95.7
100
98.6
97.6
98.1
T1C11
98.7
98.7
71.3
97.1
97.1
--
98.0
98.4
98.8
96.1
98.8
99.6
98.0
98.8
T1C29
96.3
96.4
71.1
95.8
95.8
95.5
--
97.3
97.8
95.7
97.6
97.8
100
97.0
T1N84
96.3
96.3
70.8
95.7
95.8
95.9
94.5
--
98.5
95.7
98.0
98.2
97.3
97.4
T2N84
97.1
97.1
71.0
96.5
96.6
96.7
95.4
96.5
--
96.2
98.4
98.6
97.8
97.8
T2S59
89.8
89.9
71.3
89.2
89.3
89.2
89.4
89.1
89.7
--
95.7
95.9
95.7
95.1
T3C12
97.8
97.9
71.0
99.7
99.9+
97.2
95.7
95.7
96.6
89.3
--
98.6
97.6
98.1
T3C18
98.8
98.9
71.2
97.3
97.4
99.4
95.8
95.8
96.8
89.4
97.4
--
97.8
98.6
T3C44
96.5
96.6
71.1
95.9
95.9
95.7
99.7
94.6
95.5
89.4
95.9
96.0
--
97.0
T3N83
97.7
97.8
71.4
96.4
96.4
98.6
94.7
94.9
95.8
88.5
96.4
98.4
95.0
--

a Abbreviations defined in text.

b T1L M1 and μ2 sequences for the Brown laboratory clone [31]; GenBank accession no. X59945).

c T1L M1 and μ2 sequences for the Nibert laboratory clone [23]; GenBank accession no. AF461682) and the Coombs laboratory clone (this study).

d T3D M1 and μ2 sequences for the Joklik laboratory clone [30]; GenBank accession no. M27261), and the Cashdollar laboratory clone [23]; GenBank accession no. AF461684).

e T3D M1 and μ2 sequences for the Nibert laboratory clone [23]; GenBank accession no. AF461683) and the Coombs laboratory clone (this study).

f Values for M1-gene sequence comparisons are shown below the diagonal, in bold; values for μ2-protein sequence comparisons are shown above the diagonal.

Yin et al. Virology Journal 2004 1:6   doi:10.1186/1743-422X-1-6